Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · GTM

Guatemala

Baseline index 5.67Rank 108 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years17.8rank 102 of 197 · 3 years: 17.1
Worst case−13.9%Energy supply shock · tail −13.2%
Opportunity · 10 years−1.9rank 98 of 197 · 3 years: −1.4
Best case+15Energy abundance · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed24%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.85expected index points from best practice
Breadth12 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; remittances relative to gdp; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Guatemala’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.79−0.79−1.01−0.44018Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.70−0.79−0.98−0.44019Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.56−0.67−0.86−0.38▲ 415Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.9 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.60−0.63−0.79−0.35▲ 214Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.81−0.62−0.88−0.38021Energy Infrastructure 5.2 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.49−0.53−0.73−0.32▲ 417Labour & Employment 4.7 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.57−0.53−0.67−0.29▲ 316Maritime Power 1.7 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.64−0.49−0.65−0.28▲ 112Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.9 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.44−0.47−0.64−0.28▲ 314Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.2 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.41−0.43−0.57−0.26▲ 412Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Low 0.35−0.33−0.46−0.20▲ 313Resource Infrastructure 4.5 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.41−0.31−0.41−0.18▲ 79Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.37−0.23−0.33−0.14▲ 19Internal Security & Order 5.5 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.20−0.18−0.23−0.10▲ 411Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.8 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.16−1.11−0.42−0.46−0.46−1.04−1.23−1.19−1.05
Infrastructure collapse−0.83−1.18−0.42−0.42−0.42−1.05−0.98−0.96−0.84
Pandemic−0.67−0.36−0.30−0.88−0.77−0.82−0.77−0.75−0.75
AI diffusion shock−0.71−0.35−0.32−0.94−0.71−0.97−0.83−0.45−0.40
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.29−0.39−0.96−0.43−1.08−0.57−0.43−0.43
Global financial crisis−0.27−0.27−0.24−0.53−0.53−0.67−0.89−0.76−0.61
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.87−0.73·−0.39−0.83−0.33−0.67−0.86
Legitimacy crisis−0.35·−0.72−0.36−0.84−1.17−0.96··
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.39−0.22−0.55−0.49−0.67−0.82−0.49−0.56
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.50−0.23−0.21·−0.55−0.53−0.55−0.54−0.80
Food and water shock−0.04−0.37−0.17−0.46−0.43−0.47−0.22−0.37−0.43
Single-supplier cut-off−0.54−0.16−0.21−0.26·−0.53·−0.54−0.54
Mass displacement·−0.24−0.18−0.49−0.40−0.55−0.23−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.30−0.32·−0.33−0.31·−0.12−0.12

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Guatemala is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+15.216.51.32072Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+13.220.87.63354Investment Attraction & Projection 6 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+6.513.06.532105Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+3.19.76.621119Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+2.25.33.133113Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 6 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−2.413.716.12190Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−5.413.819.133141Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−7.312.519.821115Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−11.97.519.521157Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−21.36.427.714112Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception