Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · ETH

Ethiopia

Baseline index 5.70Rank 106 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years20.2rank 92 of 197 · 3 years: 20.5
Worst case−17.3%Energy supply shock · tail −14.5%
Opportunity · 10 years+4.4rank 69 of 197 · 3 years: +2.4
Best case+24Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed22%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.00expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Legitimacy crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; no coastline; consumer price inflation; low real gdp per head; share of population aged under 15; low life expectancy at birth; few months of imports covered by reserves.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Ethiopia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.96−0.98−1.22−0.54▼ 632Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.68−0.77−0.98−0.43▼ 226Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.2 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.74−0.73−0.98−0.43▼ 429Resource Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.66−0.62−0.77−0.34023Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.75−0.59−0.76−0.33▼ 421Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.9 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.90−0.59−0.79−0.35▼ 421Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.7 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.48−0.55−0.70−0.30▲ 720Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.5 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.67−0.54−0.73−0.32▼ 125Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 4.7 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.41−0.48−0.60−0.26▲ 318Financial Stability & Crisis Management 3.7 · Nascent
Pandemic S14Medium 0.40−0.48−0.62−0.27▲ 521Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.7 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.60−0.46−0.60−0.27▼ 215Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.38−0.42−0.52−0.23▲ 518Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.30−0.32−0.42−0.18▲ 314Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.25−0.20−0.27−0.12▲ 39Maritime Power 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.20−1.38−0.51−0.57−0.57−1.29−1.53−1.48−1.31
Sovereign funding crisis−0.08−0.64−0.36−0.89−0.80−1.10−1.33−0.80−0.91
Food and water shock−0.08−0.83−0.37−1.01−0.96−1.03−0.48−0.83−0.95
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.03−0.77·−0.46−0.99−0.40−0.80−1.02
Legitimacy crisis−0.44·−0.84−0.44−1.02−1.43−1.17··
Mass displacement·−0.60−0.45−1.22−1.00−1.37−0.58−0.07·
Infrastructure collapse−0.68−0.80−0.28−0.28−0.28−0.71−0.66−0.65−0.57
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.12−0.34−0.83−0.37−0.93−0.50−0.37−0.37
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.22−0.48−0.48−0.60−0.80−0.69−0.55
Pandemic−0.51−0.26−0.21−0.62−0.54−0.58−0.54−0.53−0.53
Single-supplier cut-off−0.85−0.24−0.31−0.39·−0.78·−0.80−0.80
AI diffusion shock−0.55−0.23−0.21−0.62−0.46−0.64−0.54−0.30−0.26
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.40−0.17−0.15·−0.39−0.38−0.39−0.38−0.58
Hybrid campaign−0.15−0.33−0.35·−0.37−0.34·−0.14−0.14

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Ethiopia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+24.427.32.9326Foundational Education 6.3 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+16.817.91.02064Energy Technologies 2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+16.421.65.23460Internal Security & Order 6 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+15.018.43.42416Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+13.817.23.53018Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5.7 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+10.218.07.92440Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+4.310.56.13383Export Capability & Sophistication 6 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−1.419.620.92183Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.6 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−1.68.310.024154Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−16.45.021.41581Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception