Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · SLV

El Salvador

Baseline index 5.68Rank 107 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years22.4rank 81 of 197 · 3 years: 21.4
Worst case−16.9%Sovereign funding crisis · tail −16.1%
Opportunity · 10 years−1.8rank 97 of 197 · 3 years: −1.3
Best case+15Energy abundance · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed23%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.08expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; remittances relative to gdp; public debt relative to gdp; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; few months of imports covered by reserves; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in El Salvador’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.84−0.96−1.22−0.53▼ 531Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.82−0.90−1.13−0.51▼ 323Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.78−0.89−1.15−0.51▼ 424Investment Attraction & Projection 3.9 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.74−0.86−1.12−0.50▼ 423Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.82−0.83−1.04−0.46▼ 323Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.63−0.64−0.83−0.37022Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.85−0.63−0.93−0.40▼ 222Energy Infrastructure 5.1 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.66−0.62−0.78−0.34▼ 121Maritime Power 1.2 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.57−0.61−0.78−0.35▼ 217Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.58−0.45−0.59−0.26▲ 117Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.3 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.51−0.39−0.50−0.22▲ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.35−0.33−0.46−0.20▲ 416Resource Infrastructure 2.7 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.22−0.20−0.25−0.11▲ 212Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.7 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.34−0.20−0.30−0.13▲ 213Labour & Employment 6.3 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Sovereign funding crisis−0.10−0.80−0.45−1.11−1.00−1.38−1.67−1.00−1.14
Infrastructure collapse−0.90−1.35−0.48−0.48−0.48−1.21−1.13−1.10−0.97
Global financial crisis−0.42−0.45−0.40−0.90−0.90−1.12−1.49−1.28−1.02
Pandemic−0.80−0.47−0.38−1.13−0.99−1.06−0.99−0.97−0.97
Energy supply shock−0.12−1.17−0.44−0.49−0.49−1.10−1.30−1.26−1.12
AI diffusion shock−0.70−0.36−0.32−0.96−0.72−0.99−0.84−0.46−0.41
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.31−0.39−0.97−0.44−1.09−0.58−0.44−0.44
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.03−0.87·−0.46−0.99−0.39−0.79−1.01
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.65−0.33−0.30·−0.77−0.74−0.77−0.75−1.13
Legitimacy crisis−0.32·−0.67−0.33−0.78−1.08−0.89··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.65−0.21−0.27−0.33·−0.67·−0.68−0.68
Food and water shock−0.04−0.38−0.17−0.46−0.44−0.47−0.22−0.38−0.43
Hybrid campaign−0.15−0.32−0.35·−0.36−0.33·−0.13−0.13
Mass displacement·−0.21−0.15−0.42−0.34−0.47−0.20−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what El Salvador is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+15.216.51.31971Energy Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+11.819.27.43367Investment Attraction & Projection 5.7 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+11.414.43.13326Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 5.5 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+7.814.06.22298Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+7.614.16.53493Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−1.617.218.832118Investment Attraction & Projection 5.7 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−2.913.616.62295Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−12.17.719.821158Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−14.213.027.223150Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−20.87.228.015107Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception