Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · ECU

Ecuador

Baseline index 6.76Rank 86 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years13.9rank 124 of 197 · 3 years: 12.9
Worst case−13.0%Infrastructure collapse · tail −11.7%
Opportunity · 10 years−6.7rank 135 of 197 · 3 years: −4.9
Best case+11Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed27%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.74expected index points from best practice
Breadth6 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; few months of imports covered by reserves; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Ecuador’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.81−0.88−1.14−0.51▼ 223Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.68−0.75−0.98−0.43▼ 426Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.2 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.67−0.75−1.02−0.45▼ 125Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.3 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.57−0.64−0.84−0.37▼ 119Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 5 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.64−0.64−0.86−0.38024Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.88−0.63−0.96−0.42▼ 521Energy Infrastructure 5.8 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.51−0.52−0.71−0.31017Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.64−0.45−0.65−0.29▲ 111Monetary & Currency Capability 3.7 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.53−0.37−0.52−0.23▲ 114Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.43−0.25−0.38−0.17▲ 18Internal Security & Order 6.5 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.28−0.25−0.37−0.16▲ 57Internal Security & Order 6.8 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.24−0.23−0.31−0.14▲ 611Energy Technologies 1.7 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.20−0.26−0.11▲ 111Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.5 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.16−0.13−0.19−0.08▲ 57Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 5.2 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.03−1.29−0.46−0.46−0.46−1.15−1.07−1.05−0.92
Sovereign funding crisis−0.08−0.62−0.35−0.86−0.78−1.07−1.30−0.78−0.89
Pandemic−0.78−0.40−0.33−0.98−0.85−0.91−0.85−0.84−0.84
Global financial crisis−0.32−0.32−0.29−0.64−0.64−0.80−1.07−0.91−0.73
AI diffusion shock−0.75−0.35−0.32−0.94−0.71−0.97−0.83−0.45−0.40
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.30−0.39−0.97−0.43−1.09−0.58−0.43−0.43
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.62−0.28−0.25·−0.65−0.63−0.65−0.64−0.96
Legitimacy crisis−0.33·−0.67−0.33−0.78−1.08−0.89··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.67−0.20−0.25−0.31·−0.63·−0.64−0.64
Mass displacement·−0.25−0.19−0.52−0.42−0.58−0.25−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.03−0.28−0.13−0.34−0.33−0.35−0.16−0.28−0.32
Energy supply shock−0.05−0.32−0.12−0.13−0.13−0.30−0.35−0.34−0.30
Hybrid campaign−0.15−0.32−0.35·−0.36−0.34·−0.13−0.13
Chokepoint closure−0.02−0.22−0.19·−0.10−0.21−0.09−0.17−0.22

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Ecuador is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+11.321.710.43770Investment Attraction & Projection 6.3 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+10.816.65.82986Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+9.912.82.94132Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+1.415.614.12567Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+0.417.917.536109Investment Attraction & Projection 6.3 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−8.910.319.330142Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−10.416.226.630130Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−17.79.126.91887Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Loser−33.04.737.739182Internal Security & Order 7.3 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−54.14.458.524180Energy Technologies 2.2 · Inception