Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · CRI

Costa Rica

Baseline index 7.76Rank 70 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years14.2rank 123 of 197 · 3 years: 13.4
Worst case−11.8%Infrastructure collapse · tail −10.4%
Opportunity · 10 years+6.0rank 60 of 197 · 3 years: +7.1
Best case+23Energy abundance · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed33%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.75expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate; share of exports going to china and the united states.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Costa Rica’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.89−0.92−1.26−0.56▼ 125Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.81−0.76−1.03−0.45▼ 323Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.75−0.76−1.15−0.51026Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.7 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.71−0.65−0.96−0.42▼ 124Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.9 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.64−0.62−0.95−0.42023Economic Output & Productivity 7.3 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10High 0.97−0.58−1.04−0.46▼ 223Energy Infrastructure 6.5 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.63−0.56−0.72−0.32▼ 217Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.57−0.54−0.79−0.35▼ 116Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.2 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.57−0.51−0.82−0.36023Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.3 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.67−0.37−0.66−0.29▲ 113Force Generation & Mobilisation 1.2 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.45−0.32−0.45−0.2009Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.4 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.59−0.29−0.51−0.23011Labour & Employment 9.8 · Transitional
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.25−0.21−0.27−0.1206Air Power 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Low 0.26−0.21−0.34−0.15▲ 29Resource Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.08−1.35−0.44−0.48−0.48−1.21−1.13−1.11−0.97
Energy supply shock−0.18−1.06−0.35−0.44−0.44−0.99−1.18−1.14−1.01
Pandemic−0.81−0.41−0.30−0.99−0.86−0.92−0.86−0.85−0.85
AI diffusion shock−0.85−0.36−0.29−0.95−0.71−0.98−0.83−0.46−0.41
Global financial crisis−0.31−0.31−0.25−0.62−0.62−0.78−1.04−0.89−0.71
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.21−0.32−0.89−0.40−1.01−0.54−0.40−0.40
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.95−0.66·−0.43−0.92−0.37−0.73−0.94
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.69−0.29−0.23·−0.67−0.65−0.67−0.66−0.98
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.42−0.21−0.59−0.53−0.73−0.88−0.53−0.61
Legitimacy crisis−0.28·−0.49−0.28−0.65−0.90−0.74··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.61−0.17−0.19−0.26·−0.53·−0.54−0.54
Mass displacement·−0.29−0.20−0.60−0.49−0.67−0.29−0.04·
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.34−0.34·−0.38−0.36·−0.14−0.14
Food and water shock−0.02−0.24−0.09−0.29−0.28−0.30−0.14−0.24−0.27

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Costa Rica is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+22.923.91.02746Energy Technologies 2.4 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+18.323.04.73564Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+11.720.08.34568Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+11.225.514.34754Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.8 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+9.714.75.13582Alliances & Security Cooperation 5 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+7.016.29.13440Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+6.38.62.35467Financial Regulation & Integrity 9.8 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−6.29.115.334128Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−6.517.123.637112Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−12.214.026.22670Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.3 · Inception