Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · COM

Comoros

Baseline index 2.29Rank 183 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years45.6rank 22 of 197 · 3 years: 44.8
Worst case−43.4%Food and water shock · tail −38.3%
Opportunity · 10 years−10.0rank 157 of 197 · 3 years: −12.5
Best case+8Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed10%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.03expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; remittances relative to gdp; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Comoros’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Food and water shock S11High 0.91−0.99−1.13−0.51▼ 718Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.97−1.04−0.49▼ 318Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.69−0.66−0.71−0.34▼ 114Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.56−0.64−0.69−0.31▼ 117Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.48−0.60−0.68−0.30▲ 211Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 0.5 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.48−0.59−0.66−0.29▲ 112Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.45−0.56−0.64−0.28▲ 310Investment Attraction & Projection 0.5 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.59−0.53−0.62−0.27▼ 212Energy Infrastructure 0.6 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.49−0.53−0.58−0.26▲ 19Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.64−0.50−0.57−0.26012Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.45−0.34−0.36−0.1605Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.25−0.28−0.31−0.14▲ 25Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.32−0.23−0.27−0.12▲ 24Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.17−0.16−0.17−0.08▲ 13Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Food and water shock−0.04−0.99−0.40−1.45−1.35−1.48−0.69−1.16−1.36
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.18−0.41−0.62−0.62−1.41−1.67−1.46−1.31
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.05−0.52·−0.55−1.19−0.48−0.95−1.19
Infrastructure collapse−0.11−1.04−0.30−0.39−0.39−0.97−0.91−0.89−0.78
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.49−0.22−0.71−0.64−0.87−1.06−0.64−0.73
Pandemic−0.11−0.35−0.23−0.86−0.75−0.80−0.75−0.73−0.73
Global financial crisis−0.10−0.30−0.21−0.59−0.59−0.74−0.99−0.85−0.68
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.07−0.26−0.83−0.37−0.93−0.50−0.37−0.37
AI diffusion shock−0.11−0.34−0.24−0.90−0.68−0.93−0.79−0.44−0.39
Legitimacy crisis−0.11·−0.57−0.42−0.97−1.35−1.11··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.11−0.21−0.22−0.35·−0.71·−0.72−0.72
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.11−0.17−0.12·−0.40−0.39−0.40−0.39−0.59
Mass displacement·−0.24−0.14−0.49−0.40−0.55−0.23−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.05−0.29−0.24·−0.32−0.30·−0.12−0.12

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Comoros is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+7.69.52.01293Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+4.65.91.37118Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+2.26.64.3782Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+1.75.74.017122Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+1.17.46.314134Energy Infrastructure 2.1 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−5.62.78.311143Investment Attraction & Projection 1.7 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−9.23.212.48189Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−12.26.518.68142Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−17.66.824.48182Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−29.91.831.75161Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception