Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · CAF

Central African Rep.

Baseline index 1.66Rank 193 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 13 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years71.7rank 5 of 197 · 3 years: 72.0
Worst case−58.9%Energy supply shock · tail −50.3%
Opportunity · 10 years−11.9rank 168 of 197 · 3 years: −14.8
Best case+7Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed7%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.20expected index points from best practice
Breadth0 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, Legitimacy crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; no coastline; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Central African Rep.’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.93−0.98−1.03−0.50▼ 27Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.65−0.83−0.91−0.40▼ 17Energy Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.56−0.70−0.76−0.35▼ 27Economic Output & Productivity 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.90−0.69−0.75−0.34▼ 37Internal Security & Order 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.70−0.68−0.71−0.3405Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.50−0.64−0.68−0.3107Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.53−0.62−0.65−0.29▼ 17Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.73−0.58−0.63−0.2906Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.43−0.50−0.55−0.2406Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.49−0.47−0.52−0.2306Energy Infrastructure 0.4 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.37−0.41−0.43−0.20▲ 27Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.54−0.40−0.43−0.19▼ 14Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.32−0.37−0.40−0.18▲ 15Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.23−0.21−0.23−0.1004Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.02−1.23−0.41−0.65−0.65−1.47−1.74−1.34−1.31
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.71−0.30−0.99−0.89−1.23−1.42−0.89−1.02
Global financial crisis−0.09−0.38−0.26−0.76−0.76−0.95−1.26−1.01−0.84
Mass displacement·−0.72−0.39−1.44−1.18−1.66−0.71−0.09·
Chokepoint closure−0.02−1.11−0.54·−0.57−1.23−0.49−0.98−1.17
Pandemic−0.09−0.38−0.24−0.93−0.80−0.87−0.81−0.80−0.80
Infrastructure collapse−0.09−1.02−0.26−0.37−0.37−0.94−0.87−0.86−0.75
Legitimacy crisis−0.09·−0.65−0.50−1.05−1.62−1.33··
Food and water shock−0.02−0.57−0.20−0.71−0.68−0.73−0.34−0.58−0.67
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.97−0.23−0.73−0.33−0.82−0.44−0.33−0.33
AI diffusion shock−0.09−0.26−0.18−0.69−0.52−0.71−0.60−0.33−0.30
Single-supplier cut-off−0.09−0.26−0.26−0.42·−0.85·−0.86−0.86
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.09−0.23−0.16·−0.53−0.51−0.53−0.52−0.78
Hybrid campaign−0.07−0.39−0.28·−0.43−0.41·−0.16−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Central African Rep. is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.97.50.6998Investment Attraction & Projection 1.3 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+2.84.21.35125Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+1.86.24.311119Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−0.26.46.710141Energy Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−1.33.24.55106Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−6.22.68.88147Investment Attraction & Projection 1.3 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−6.64.711.36114Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Loser−11.12.213.35193Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−21.35.126.45190Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−30.01.031.03163Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception