Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · CPV

Cabo Verde

Baseline index 4.72Rank 124 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years27.6rank 65 of 197 · 3 years: 27.1
Worst case−20.0%Energy supply shock · tail −19.3%
Opportunity · 10 years−1.6rank 93 of 197 · 3 years: −1.9
Best case+13Sovereign debt reset · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed21%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.13expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; public debt relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; remittances relative to gdp; youth unemployment rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Cabo Verde’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.94−1.11−0.50▼ 625Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.83−0.91−1.19−0.52▼ 421Economic Output & Productivity 2.1 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.81−0.88−1.03−0.47▼ 225Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.71−0.80−1.01−0.45▼ 121Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.72−0.75−1.03−0.45▼ 222Energy Infrastructure 2.4 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.79−0.75−0.87−0.40▼ 520Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.68−0.66−0.83−0.37▼ 117Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.76−0.57−0.81−0.36▼ 519Energy Infrastructure 2.4 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.58−0.56−0.75−0.33▼ 216Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.75−0.47−0.70−0.31▼ 114Force Generation & Mobilisation 1.5 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.44−0.46−0.55−0.24▲ 113Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.59−0.43−0.50−0.22013Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.43−0.26−0.37−0.1607Labour & Employment 6 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.23−0.20−0.24−0.10▲ 15Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.08−1.23−0.43−0.57−0.57−1.29−1.53−1.48−1.31
Global financial crisis−0.21−0.48−0.36−0.96−0.96−1.20−1.60−1.37−1.09
Infrastructure collapse−0.36−1.43−0.43−0.51−0.51−1.28−1.19−1.17−1.02
Pandemic−0.32−0.47−0.32−1.14−0.99−1.06−0.99−0.97−0.97
Sovereign funding crisis−0.08−0.63−0.30−0.88−0.79−1.09−1.32−0.79−0.90
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.21−0.81·−0.59−1.27−0.51−1.01−1.30
AI diffusion shock−0.33−0.41−0.31−1.08−0.81−1.12−0.95−0.52−0.46
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.18−0.30−0.88−0.39−0.99−0.53−0.39−0.39
Food and water shock−0.06−0.62−0.25−0.79−0.76−0.81−0.38−0.65−0.74
Legitimacy crisis−0.17·−0.62−0.37−0.87−1.22−1.00··
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.23−0.27−0.22·−0.64−0.62−0.64−0.63−0.94
Single-supplier cut-off−0.29−0.27−0.29−0.42·−0.86·−0.87−0.87
Mass displacement·−0.27−0.18−0.54−0.44−0.61−0.26−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.07−0.36−0.32·−0.40−0.37·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Cabo Verde is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+13.216.23.03820Financial Regulation & Integrity 6.3 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+12.916.94.02559Industrial & Sectoral Base 3.5 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+4.38.03.71563Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+2.414.111.726122Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+1.48.06.520102Export Capability & Sophistication 3.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.710.29.516141Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−1.112.613.614135Energy Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−1.315.016.32082Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−6.512.318.818113Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−28.15.934.012153Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception