Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · BRA

Brazil

Baseline index 11.69Rank 30 of 197TransitionalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years6.0rank 178 of 197 · 3 years: 5.3
Worst case−6.3%Infrastructure collapse · tail −5.3%
Opportunity · 10 years+9.7rank 47 of 197 · 3 years: +12.8
Best case+32100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed46%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.26expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkInternal Security & Orderweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Legitimacy crisis, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; public debt relative to gdp; oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Brazil’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.91−0.74−1.31−0.57▼ 125Sensing, Timing & Navigation 7.3 · Foundational
Pandemic S14High 0.70−0.58−1.08−0.47019Labour & Employment 9.9 · Transitional
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.67−0.54−0.92−0.40017Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.2 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03High 0.61−0.47−0.92−0.40012Labour & Employment 10 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.60−0.46−0.86−0.38▼ 212Internal Security & Order 9.7 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.73−0.40−0.75−0.33▼ 212Internal Security & Order 9.5 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10High 0.65−0.37−0.71−0.31▼ 115Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 11.2 · Transitional
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.40−0.30−0.57−0.25010Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.7 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.63−0.29−0.55−0.24▼ 17Internal Security & Order 9.7 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.38−0.20−0.39−0.1709Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.7 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.30−0.19−0.33−0.14011Sensing, Timing & Navigation 8.5 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.25−0.17−0.33−0.14▼ 19Internal Security & Order 10.3 · Transitional
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.22−0.14−0.28−0.12▲ 18Energy Technologies 9.5 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.12−0.07−0.14−0.06▲ 28Economic Leverage & Dependence 11.2 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.92−1.07−0.38−0.38−0.38−0.96−0.89−0.88−0.77
Pandemic−0.62−0.31−0.25−0.75−0.66−0.71−0.66−0.64−0.64
AI diffusion shock−0.71−0.29−0.26−0.78−0.59−0.81−0.69−0.38−0.34
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.21−0.48−0.48−0.59−0.79−0.68−0.54
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.38−0.22−0.53−0.48−0.66−0.80−0.48−0.55
Legitimacy crisis−0.30·−0.59−0.30−0.69−0.96−0.79··
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.77−0.23−0.57−0.26−0.64−0.34−0.26−0.26
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.39−0.16−0.15·−0.38−0.36−0.38−0.37−0.55
Mass displacement·−0.29−0.22−0.60−0.49−0.68−0.29−0.04·
Single-supplier cut-off−0.38−0.10−0.13−0.16·−0.33·−0.34−0.34
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.31−0.34·−0.34−0.32·−0.13−0.13
Food and water shock−0.02−0.19−0.09−0.24−0.23−0.24−0.11−0.19−0.22
Energy supply shock−0.03−0.20−0.08−0.08−0.08−0.19−0.22−0.22−0.19
Chokepoint closure−0.01−0.11−0.10·−0.05−0.11−0.04−0.09−0.11

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Brazil is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+32.135.83.75937Population Health 11.3 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+22.428.76.36015Foundational Education 11.3 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+18.428.39.9549Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+14.825.510.66145Export Capability & Sophistication 11.7 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+10.130.220.15741Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+10.011.71.76231Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 12 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed+1.521.820.34143Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−9.910.019.959168Internal Security & Order 10.7 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−10.817.428.258149Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 10.7 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−19.610.129.756162Energy Technologies 9.8 · Transitional