Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · BWA

Botswana

Baseline index 6.08Rank 96 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years19.0rank 95 of 197 · 3 years: 19.5
Worst case−15.5%Energy supply shock · tail −14.5%
Opportunity · 10 years+2.2rank 78 of 197 · 3 years: +1.6
Best case+16Energy abundance · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed27%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.92expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Legitimacy crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; youth unemployment rate; low life expectancy at birth; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Botswana’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.97−0.94−1.22−0.54▼ 425Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.85−0.94−1.14−0.52▼ 423Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.68−0.76−1.01−0.45▼ 119Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.74−0.69−0.85−0.37▼ 218Maritime Power 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.68−0.67−0.88−0.39▼ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.83−0.54−0.82−0.36▼ 111Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.4 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.74−0.52−0.68−0.31▼ 115Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.53−0.51−0.79−0.35▲ 314Investment Attraction & Projection 5.3 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.48−0.43−0.62−0.27010Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4.8 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.46−0.42−0.66−0.2908Energy Infrastructure 3.3 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.37−0.37−0.50−0.22▲ 36Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.52−0.36−0.56−0.25▲ 110Energy Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.21−0.26−0.11▲ 14Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.38−0.21−0.33−0.1403Labour & Employment 7.3 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.12−1.34−0.45−0.56−0.56−1.26−1.49−1.44−1.28
Infrastructure collapse−0.79−1.45−0.47−0.52−0.52−1.30−1.21−1.18−1.04
Pandemic−0.68−0.42−0.30−1.01−0.88−0.94−0.88−0.86−0.86
Chokepoint closure−0.09−1.17−0.81·−0.52−1.12−0.45−0.90−1.15
AI diffusion shock−0.69−0.38−0.31−1.02−0.77−1.05−0.89−0.49−0.44
Legitimacy crisis−0.37·−0.73−0.41−0.95−1.32−1.08··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.73−0.29−0.33−0.46·−0.93·−0.95−0.95
Global financial crisis−0.25−0.26−0.21−0.52−0.52−0.65−0.87−0.74−0.59
Food and water shock−0.05−0.50−0.20−0.61−0.58−0.62−0.29−0.50−0.57
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.35−0.17−0.49−0.44−0.60−0.73−0.44−0.50
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.41−0.20−0.16·−0.48−0.46−0.48−0.47−0.70
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.75−0.20−0.56−0.25−0.63−0.33−0.25−0.25
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.35−0.32·−0.39−0.37·−0.15−0.15
Mass displacement·−0.22−0.14−0.44−0.36−0.50−0.21−0.03·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Botswana is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+15.516.30.91869Energy Technologies 1.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+11.215.34.12875Energy Infrastructure 4.1 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.610.12.44851Financial Regulation & Integrity 9.3 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+7.010.23.12244Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+4.710.45.73081Export Capability & Sophistication 5.3 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+4.718.413.728122Energy Infrastructure 4.1 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+4.313.28.921110Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+3.919.715.92467Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+0.716.215.52371Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−22.37.629.915119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception