Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · BRB

Barbados

Baseline index 5.56Rank 110 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years17.9rank 100 of 197 · 3 years: 16.9
Worst case−13.8%Global financial crisis · tail −13.0%
Opportunity · 10 years−6.9rank 137 of 197 · 3 years: −5.6
Best case+7Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed25%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.82expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock, Energy supply shock. Highest exposure indicators: public debt relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; youth unemployment rate; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over; services as a share of gdp; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Barbados’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Global financial crisis S03High 0.75−0.77−1.07−0.47▼ 211Investment Attraction & Projection 3.7 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.70−0.74−0.90−0.41▲ 111Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.65−0.66−0.92−0.40▲ 113Energy Infrastructure 3.4 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.72−0.66−0.88−0.40011Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.61−0.66−0.87−0.39▲ 213Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.64−0.65−0.81−0.36▲ 411Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.50−0.48−0.58−0.25▲ 310Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.41−0.42−0.53−0.24▲ 28Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.65−0.42−0.61−0.27▲ 14Force Generation & Mobilisation 1.4 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.43−0.40−0.57−0.25▲ 17Resource Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.54−0.37−0.57−0.25▲ 47Energy Infrastructure 3.7 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.36−0.26−0.32−0.14▲ 54Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.21−0.24−0.11▲ 26Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.33−0.18−0.29−0.13▲ 14Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 8.3 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Global financial crisis−0.23−0.40−0.28−0.80−0.80−1.00−1.34−1.14−0.92
Infrastructure collapse−0.40−1.18−0.34−0.43−0.43−1.07−1.00−0.98−0.86
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.56−0.24−0.77−0.70−0.96−1.16−0.70−0.80
AI diffusion shock−0.41−0.40−0.28−1.07−0.80−1.10−0.93−0.51−0.46
Pandemic−0.36−0.38−0.24−0.92−0.81−0.86−0.81−0.79−0.79
Energy supply shock−0.10−0.92−0.27−0.39−0.39−0.87−1.04−1.00−0.89
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.82−0.56·−0.37−0.79−0.31−0.63−0.81
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.26−0.25−0.17·−0.57−0.55−0.57−0.56−0.84
Legitimacy crisis−0.19·−0.52−0.33−0.77−1.07−0.87··
Food and water shock−0.05−0.46−0.16−0.57−0.54−0.58−0.27−0.46−0.53
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.77−0.18−0.57−0.26−0.64−0.34−0.26−0.26
Single-supplier cut-off−0.28−0.16−0.16−0.25·−0.50·−0.51−0.51
Hybrid campaign−0.09−0.37−0.31·−0.41−0.38·−0.15−0.15
Mass displacement·−0.19−0.11−0.39−0.32−0.43−0.18−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Barbados is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.913.56.63196Energy Infrastructure 4.8 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+6.59.22.74462Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 8 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+4.310.15.820111Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−1.111.813.017134Energy Technologies 1 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−2.79.512.228152Alliances & Security Cooperation 4 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−3.110.413.42197Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−8.59.818.224157Export Capability & Sophistication 4 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−15.25.620.819168Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−21.710.432.022173Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−25.37.532.714137Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception