Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · AUS

Australia

Baseline index 14.95Rank 12 of 197EstablishedIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years4.0rank 194 of 197 · 3 years: 3.8
Worst case−3.4%Infrastructure collapse · tail −3.3%
Opportunity · 10 years+20.5rank 24 of 197 · 3 years: +22.6
Best case+52100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 7 of 10
Shock absorbed59%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.04expected index points from best practice
Breadth7 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkEnergy Infrastructureweakest point in 5 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; internet users as a share of population; adult obesity rate; urban share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Australia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.80−0.51−1.16−0.48012Energy Infrastructure 12.2 · Established
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.85−0.51−1.17−0.49013Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.1 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.75−0.46−1.16−0.46010Information Environment & Strategic Communication 13.4 · Established
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.56−0.35−0.79−0.3309Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.4 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.60−0.34−0.89−0.3409Economic Output & Productivity 13.8 · Established
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.60−0.34−0.87−0.34▼ 18Energy Infrastructure 12.5 · Established
Disaster in the core S10High 0.82−0.33−0.90−0.3309Energy Infrastructure 12.3 · Established
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.65−0.29−0.66−0.2708Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.3 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.36−0.20−0.46−0.18▲ 17Energy Technologies 11.3 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.46−0.19−0.47−0.1904Force Generation & Mobilisation 11.8 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.39−0.18−0.46−0.18▲ 17Energy Infrastructure 12.8 · Established
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.39−0.17−0.43−0.1708Energy Infrastructure 12.8 · Established
Food and water shock S11Low 0.26−0.13−0.35−0.1307Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 14.4 · Established
Mass displacement S08Low 0.35−0.11−0.31−0.1103Labour & Employment 15.9 · Advanced

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.64−0.74−0.27−0.27−0.27−0.66−0.62−0.61−0.53
AI diffusion shock−0.66−0.28−0.25−0.74−0.55−0.76−0.64−0.35−0.32
Pandemic−0.49−0.25−0.20−0.60−0.52−0.56−0.52−0.51−0.51
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.44−0.18−0.17·−0.43−0.41−0.43−0.42−0.63
Global financial crisis−0.17−0.17−0.15−0.34−0.34−0.43−0.57−0.49−0.39
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.28−0.16−0.39−0.36−0.49−0.59−0.36−0.41
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.68−0.20−0.50−0.23−0.56−0.30−0.23−0.23
Single-supplier cut-off−0.56−0.15−0.19−0.24·−0.48·−0.49−0.49
Energy supply shock−0.05−0.28−0.10−0.12−0.12−0.26−0.31−0.30−0.26
Legitimacy crisis−0.14·−0.28−0.14−0.32−0.45−0.37··
Chokepoint closure−0.02−0.30−0.25·−0.13−0.29−0.12−0.23−0.30
Hybrid campaign−0.13−0.28−0.30·−0.31−0.29·−0.12−0.12
Food and water shock−0.02−0.15−0.07−0.19−0.18−0.19−0.09−0.15−0.17
Mass displacement·−0.11−0.09−0.23−0.19−0.26−0.11−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Australia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+51.752.71.07615Information Environment & Strategic Communication 14.3 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+30.040.09.95117Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 6.2 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+26.237.811.6794Biotechnology & Health Technologies 15.2 · Advanced
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+24.333.69.37021Export Capability & Sophistication 13.3 · Established
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+22.125.73.6744Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 13.4 · Established
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+19.929.29.37123Energy Infrastructure 13.3 · Established
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+10.021.511.57279Energy Infrastructure 13.3 · Established
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+5.46.20.88075Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 15.5 · Advanced
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−2.214.817.077114Transport Infrastructure 14.9 · Established
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−4.217.822.066144Energy Technologies 11.8 · Transitional