Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · ARG

Argentina

Baseline index 9.25Rank 55 of 197TransitionalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years9.2rank 155 of 197 · 3 years: 8.2
Worst case−9.5%Infrastructure collapse · tail −8.0%
Opportunity · 10 years+4.4rank 68 of 197 · 3 years: +6.5
Best case+25100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed36%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.53expected index points from best practice
Breadth11 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: staple foods among the top five imports; consumer price inflation; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Argentina’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.94−0.88−1.36−0.59▼ 123Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.72−0.69−1.11−0.49▼ 118Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.7 · Foundational
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.64−0.66−0.92−0.40▼ 218Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.53−0.57−0.79−0.34018Financial Stability & Crisis Management 5.8 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.66−0.57−0.91−0.40019Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.83−0.53−0.91−0.40012Financial System Depth & Access 7.7 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.82−0.51−0.84−0.37014Monetary & Currency Capability 4.8 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11High 0.63−0.49−0.83−0.36▼ 315Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 7.9 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.28−0.26−0.39−0.17▲ 111Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.9 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.42−0.26−0.42−0.19▲ 19Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.7 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.25−0.19−0.28−0.12▲ 18Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.7 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.37−0.19−0.32−0.1408Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 8.2 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.23−0.18−0.30−0.13▲ 410Monetary & Currency Capability 5.9 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.11−0.08−0.13−0.06▲ 67Economic Leverage & Dependence 6.5 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.10−1.28−0.46−0.46−0.46−1.15−1.07−1.05−0.92
Pandemic−0.73−0.37−0.30−0.89−0.78−0.83−0.78−0.76−0.76
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.55−0.31−0.77−0.69−0.95−1.15−0.69−0.79
Global financial crisis−0.29−0.29−0.26−0.58−0.58−0.72−0.96−0.82−0.66
AI diffusion shock−0.74−0.31−0.28−0.82−0.62−0.85−0.72−0.40−0.35
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.10−0.33−0.81−0.37−0.92−0.49−0.37−0.37
Legitimacy crisis−0.37·−0.75−0.37−0.87−1.21−1.00··
Food and water shock−0.06−0.56−0.25−0.69−0.65−0.70−0.33−0.56−0.64
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.33−0.14−0.12·−0.32−0.31−0.32−0.32−0.47
Single-supplier cut-off−0.50−0.13−0.17−0.21·−0.43·−0.44−0.44
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.31−0.33·−0.34−0.32·−0.13−0.13
Mass displacement·−0.19−0.14−0.39−0.32−0.44−0.19−0.02·
Energy supply shock−0.04−0.25−0.09−0.11−0.11−0.24−0.28−0.27−0.24
Chokepoint closure−0.01−0.13−0.11·−0.06−0.12−0.05−0.10−0.13

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Argentina is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+24.829.54.74750Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+14.424.39.85046Investment Attraction & Projection 8.7 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+8.920.511.74032Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 5.6 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+6.49.12.74763Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 8.5 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+3.18.04.944122Energy Technologies 7 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−0.325.425.75089Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 8.7 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−0.913.514.446114Export Capability & Sophistication 8.3 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−1.46.17.551148Alliances & Security Cooperation 9.5 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−7.616.424.03057Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−12.631.243.850162Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 8.7 · Foundational