Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

South Asia · AFG

Afghanistan

Baseline index 1.46Rank 196 of 197InceptionSouth AsiaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 13 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years72.8rank 4 of 197 · 3 years: 69.4
Worst case−65.5%Food and water shock · tail −59.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−17.1rank 190 of 197 · 3 years: −19.8
Best case+6Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed6%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.04expected index points from best practice
Breadth0 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Legitimacy crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; no coastline; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Afghanistan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Food and water shock S11High 0.92−0.96−1.03−0.52▼ 19Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.90−0.94−0.49▼ 18Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.84−0.76−0.80−0.41▼ 17Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.70−0.66−0.74−0.3309Energy Infrastructure 0.4 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.74−0.56−0.58−0.29▲ 16Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.50−0.56−0.59−0.2707Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.54−0.56−0.59−0.2807Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.43−0.54−0.58−0.26▲ 18Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.41−0.53−0.56−0.26▲ 38Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Low 0.31−0.41−0.43−0.19▲ 47Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.28−0.32−0.33−0.15▲ 15Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.38−0.30−0.33−0.15▲ 28Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Low 0.34−0.25−0.26−0.12▲ 16Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.27−0.24−0.25−0.1105Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Food and water shock−0.02−1.17−0.40−1.44−1.24−1.45−0.72−1.03−1.16
Energy supply shock−0.02−1.38−0.41−0.64−0.64−1.33−1.44−1.22−1.07
Chokepoint closure−0.02−1.43−0.61·−0.69−1.39−0.59−0.99−1.15
Disaster in the core−0.02−1.39−0.33−1.04−0.47−1.14−0.62−0.47−0.47
Legitimacy crisis−0.02·−0.68−0.52−1.14−1.39−1.30··
Infrastructure collapse−0.02−0.98−0.30−0.35−0.35−0.87−0.73−0.74−0.70
AI diffusion shock−0.02−0.38−0.28−0.91−0.77−0.88−0.87−0.49−0.44
Pandemic−0.02−0.33−0.23−0.80−0.70−0.75−0.70−0.66−0.68
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.46−0.23−0.64−0.58−0.78−0.85−0.56−0.66
Global financial crisis−0.02−0.22−0.18−0.45−0.45−0.56−0.74−0.58−0.48
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.02−0.20−0.16·−0.46−0.43−0.46−0.45−0.68
Mass displacement·−0.30−0.20−0.62−0.51−0.70−0.30−0.04·
Single-supplier cut-off−0.02−0.17−0.19−0.26·−0.50·−0.54−0.54
Hybrid campaign−0.02−0.45−0.35·−0.50−0.47·−0.19−0.19

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Afghanistan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.06.70.87111Investment Attraction & Projection 0.7 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+0.45.04.6594Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−2.22.24.49166Financial Regulation & Integrity 1.3 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−2.64.57.1697Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−6.52.08.56180Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−7.36.313.610163Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 1.5 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−16.14.921.05160Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−23.93.527.34195Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−25.61.226.85189Investment Attraction & Projection 0.7 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−52.61.454.03197Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception